Then I don't understand why we are having this conversation
It's just a suggestion to help netfleet close a few more deals...
Honestly I doesn't really worry me that much, actually its sometimes nice to have a domain pass in just under reserve because you think, "sweet my valuation is pretty reasonable and maybe if I ever put it up for sale again maybe I'll do a bit more marketing and I might be able to get an even better price for it in the future so I'm glad it didn't sell today"...
But of course that isn't what NetFleet wants, nor is what most domainers should look to do either, so I would have though NetFleet would be all about pushing to squeeze those extra few dollars out of buyers to get the deal to happen.
I just mentioned it because at the same time it always seems like a missed opportunity in this industry where transactions are so infrequent when a buyer and seller are within 10% - 20% of each other but can't find terms.
The downside is impossible to see since it is very hard to read peoples minds, but I am firm believer that if there are soft alternative options to an auction then buyers will try to exploit this and will not bid as hard or might not bid at all.
Then you just have to give them incentives to not try and game the system.
That normally involves creating a situation where they fear they may miss out if they don't bid their highest bid.
This will lead to the sellers unwittingly or even intentionally putting in higher reserves since they are well aware of the followup offers. In theory both parties have to be kept honest which is not feasible.
Potentially... but at the same time sellers that genuinely want to sell are always going have to come down in price and meet the market.
NetFleet's ambition should always be to motivate as many of the current fence sitters to put their domains up for auction as possible, but that will only happen if they see the AMA as a selling method that will yield good returns with low risk.
Did you notice what happened to HousePlans.com.au today?
Remember this thread where you said "It's a cracking domain with some great metrics. I would have loved to have seen how it performed if it had of been on the front page. "
https://www.dntrade.com.au/important-upcoming-changes-netfleet-com-t6329p13.html
It was turned in at $3000 back then and it sold today in a no-reserve auction for $3,223 While this is not a huge result it is still solid and it shows how a no reserve auction gets better results. I am also sure there are more examples of this.
HAHAHA I had forgot all about that.
I guess that is a positive result which tentatively suggests that at least you won't do worse than if you had a reserve... but it's FAR from compelling and I'd need to see a lot more examples of this before I rushed to list and truly decent domains for no reserve auction.
TBH I think the seller has every right to be a bit disappointed - they took a HUGE risk putting it up for no reserve and ultimately they only got $223 extra for all that additional risk...
And let's not forget that it passed in at $3000 which was obviously a price they were not happy with previously. So I suspect they won't be over the moon with $3223 anyway...
I am very close to being convinced that this is a good idea and I was looking into the logistics of implementing this. Basic idea was you could lower your reserve to match the current asking price so that if they bid $1 more then it will be on the market. At the moment I am focusing on a "push to auction" option from the domain catalogue which will take priority over this.
I would seriously consider NOT making it +$1.
Today I'd say the majority of the domains I had listed didn't get anymore bids after 60 minutes to go, so I think 95% would still pass in if they required an additional bid.
Plus I know I wouldn't click the button if it didn't instantly put my domain on the front page, because if it needs one more bid to go to the front page there is a good chance you'd be waiting until the final seconds for that bid (if one was to come at all) which would defeat the purpose of being pushed to market.