snoopy
Top Contributor
That is exactly what it is about. Delaying tactics. They'll either delay it until after the SGM or release it just before so proper checks can't be done on these "members".
Branch stacking!
- Thread starter snoopy
- Start date
That is exactly what it is about. Delaying tactics. They'll either delay it until after the SGM or release it just before so proper checks can't be done on these "members".
Scott.L
Top Contributor
auDA won't publish the list of foreign applicants approved by the Board because when they do, we will know who sold out for a pocketful of coin - SELL OUTS
snoopy
Top Contributor
I think when this list comes out every man and his dog will know what a disgrace auDA has become.
Scott.L
Top Contributor
Yeah, I think a lot of transfers are gonna happen; the question is, who will be the lucky registrar that didn't get involved in this betrayal.
snoopy
Top Contributor
Far as I know 4 involved.
http://www.domainpulse.com/2018/06/18/auda-stacks-membership-no-accountability/
Data Glasses
Top Contributor
I have more trust in .Kangeroo than Auda
Bacon Farmer
Top Contributor
That's a good question for Sandra Hook, Chair of the Governance Committee of auDA.
snoopy
Top Contributor
Didn't they come up with a eligibility criteria just prior to approving those 900+ members? I believe they are also delaying publishing what this new policy is.
I think auDA are sapping credibility from the CMWG because the board has already influenced the CMWG's vote. The CMWG will never be able to say "well the members voted for it" when the new membership base are not genuine members. The allegations of election rigging are going to go on for years if the 900+ new members are allowed to influence the vote.
I think the CMWG should be investigating whether these 900+ members are "above board". It is their vote and their credibility that auDA is playing with.
Issues they should be looking at in my view,
e.g.
I think auDA are sapping credibility from the CMWG because the board has already influenced the CMWG's vote. The CMWG will never be able to say "well the members voted for it" when the new membership base are not genuine members. The allegations of election rigging are going to go on for years if the 900+ new members are allowed to influence the vote.
I think the CMWG should be investigating whether these 900+ members are "above board". It is their vote and their credibility that auDA is playing with.
Issues they should be looking at in my view,
e.g.
- Were membership payments made "in bulk"?
- Were inducements offered to join auDA by 3rd parties?
- Do these members know anything about auDA and why did they decide to join?
- Did these members join in a manner which was constitutional and in line with published procedure/policy?
snoopy
Top Contributor
Good article on branch stacking,
https://itwire.com/strategy/83696-auda-dissenter-claims-membership-now-mostly-from-abroad.html
auDA's anonymous spokesperson tries to distract from the issue of branch stacking by playing the race card. Seems Boardman doesn't want to put his name to anything coming out of auDA right now, instead they have an unnamed person talking, why?
https://itwire.com/strategy/83696-auda-dissenter-claims-membership-now-mostly-from-abroad.html
auDA's anonymous spokesperson tries to distract from the issue of branch stacking by playing the race card. Seems Boardman doesn't want to put his name to anything coming out of auDA right now, instead they have an unnamed person talking, why?
Scott.L
Top Contributor
i responded on ITwire
AND THEN IT HIT ME - All the previous Boards did not do what this Board has done, it is this Board that broke the unspoken RULE for control, this Board invited Government intervention, and its this Board that has caused all this Bullshit.
Why hasn't the Board Sacked Boardman?
AND THEN IT HIT ME - All the previous Boards did not do what this Board has done, it is this Board that broke the unspoken RULE for control, this Board invited Government intervention, and its this Board that has caused all this Bullshit.
Why hasn't the Board Sacked Boardman?
Bacon Farmer
Top Contributor
Boardman is the Board's man.
joshrowe
Top Contributor
auDA’s spokesperson is Ian Hanke. He doesn’t come cheap. Google him.
snoopy
Top Contributor
That is the million dollar question.
Scott.L
Top Contributor
what will it cost to sack him? I wouldnt think its much considering the shit he has pulled. s181CA
snoopy
Top Contributor
That is the million dollar question.
