neddy
Top Contributor
Just been reading this case which I found really interesting. It concerns using a TM in a domain name.
At first glance, I would have thought that the Complainant would easily win (had 7 TM'S!), but it just
shows that sometimes people (panelist's!) see things differently.
The Panelist found that the Respondent was "not acting in bad faith".
Here is the Respondent's brief response:
All I can say is bookmark this case!
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2011-0358
At first glance, I would have thought that the Complainant would easily win (had 7 TM'S!), but it just
shows that sometimes people (panelist's!) see things differently.
The Panelist found that the Respondent was "not acting in bad faith".
Here is the Respondent's brief response:
In a brief response, Respondent states that the mere use of a trademark as part of a domain name does not constitute 'a trademark violation. Respondent contends further as follows: “There is no confusion or misrepresentation on the site as to whether it’s the original p90x site or owned by Beach Body, LLC. It clearly gives a review of the product (p90x), which I own, and in fact, even gives a positive review, so I clearly not trying to harm Beach Body or alter sales of p90x in a negative way. I use the site to share my experiences with p90x and to specifically talk about its workout schedule. I don’t pretend to be an official site, nor do I try and confuse anyone about that fact.”
All I can say is bookmark this case!
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2011-0358