snoopy
Top Contributor
So the way I see it is even if they apply retrospectively, their upside is large, their downside is small, so their ethics will likely reflect that.
Or maybe they will email everyone offering them to "opt out" of which most will ignore, but making it a little less "dodgy".
Agree. I think they are probably making the best business decision. Maybe they should just be flexible with the people who complain about the charge on names they didn't want, (they'll likely have to be otherwise it will probably just be chargebacks).