Lemon
Top Contributor
That could be a dangerous game to play.
That could be a dangerous game to play.
Has he ever submitted an application for auDA Demand Class Director while the CEO of a Supply Registrar?
That could be a dangerous game to play.
Here are a few things to consider.I admire the fact that you think auDA will still be around in a couple of months. The smart money is on exactly what Ian has described above.
One has to consider the consequences.The Power of One.
Here are a few things to consider.
By "you" I was referring to everyone because I am sure you have considered this already as any sensible stakeholder should.I have already considered this and more, and it's exactly why I said in that other thread that we, as a group of members since supply and demand will no longer exist, should start finding some common ground and working towards our goals.
if you had to hand that to someone then i will say i am the person, i have already expressed to the chair that i have no intention of stopping auda from continuing with business, all i want is the best outcome for the organisation and stakeholders.The Power of One.
If auDA is unable to operate in 3 months then the government will take over. You will no longer be a member and will have to apply to the new entity. A new entity means new constitution. Probably a stricter membership policy with a Code of Conduct and greater powers to expel members. The new entity would most likely have the powers to expel members through the board or a membership committee. It would no longer go to a 75% vote.
Is this what you want?
I admire the fact that you think auDA will still be around in a couple of months. The smart money is on exactly what Ian has described above.
As far as I am aware, under the Corporations Act then the government can't interfere. They have to abide by the constitution or shut it down.The government isn't just going to close it on a whim in my view. Agree though that the board falling to 5 could trigger it. They'll do some rushed appointments (judging by the wording of that email) to shore things up. That way they are are back to 8 if the 3 independents go at the SGM.
As far as I am aware, under the Corporations Act then the government can't interfere. They have to abide by the constitution or shut it down.
Maybe you can check with the legal team.
You never know who will be on the boardI'm talking about auDA doing rushed appointments in the short term simply because the director count is getting low and because they face the prospect of losing another 3. The same strategy was being used with the PRP, fill up spots even if the person doesn't fit the available spot.
Read the email, they are already trying to justify the bad decisions that will surely be coming.
To my knowledge, last time he applied he did so as a Supply member? I'm pretty sure that's on public record.
He's in a class of his own.Tim re-read 24.1 - carefully. (33rd word)
Business class or economyHe's in a class of his own.