seo.com.au

[nt81]

Tidy profit on a $20 domain. Not exactly a loss, but I agree - it was sold undervalued.

 

[helloworld]

I just had a call with the seller of the domain today, I actually feel sorry for him with the situation. It sounded like he actually did not want to sell the domain in the first place yet was forced to due to un-foreseen matters.

Well I hope you didn't tell him it real value

 

[Horshack]

I believe this domain name had been for sale for quite some time.

 

[snoopy]

I believe this domain name had been for sale for quite some time.

Thinking about this a bit more, the price he got is probably way above anything he has been offered in the past. I guess it is easy for some to say "cheap" or "I'd have paid more" after it was already sold but clearly domainers knew about it and none of them offered more.

The other thing is this is the highest known .com.au this year so to call "cheap" could be stretching things. Actually this is the highest reported .com.au sale in 3 years according to namebio.

 

[Horshack]

I could be wrong but I'm sure I've seen it for sale on Netfleet in the past plus on domainmarketplace.com.au earlier this year. Here's the link to the one this year http://www.domainmarketplace.com.au/online-and-internet/premium-aftermarket-domain-names/seo_com_au/

 

[James]

Thinking about this a bit more, the price he got is probably way above anything he has been offered in the past. I guess it is easy for some to say "cheap" or "I'd have paid more" after it was already sold but clearly domainers knew about it and none of them offered more.

The other thing is this is the highest known .com.au this year so to call "cheap" could be stretching things. Actually this is the highest reported .com.au sale in 3 years according to namebio.

200k sale noted here - http://www.jameswester.com/blog/news/carloan-com-au-sets-pace-in-1-spot-for-au-sales/

Yet it is not an official release from the buyer per say.