Biscuit.com.au

[findtim]

"3.1 cents today:"

there are a lot of people made a lot of money along the way, todays price means nothing.

"I've told you before I've never said this so why keep making the same incorrect claim?"

sorry but i am sure you did, so firstly i will retract the statement until i find the QUOTE where you did make it.

tim

 

[snoopy]

"3.1 cents today:"

there are a lot of people made a lot of money along the way, todays price means nothing.

"I've told you before I've never said this so why keep making the same incorrect claim?"

sorry but i am sure you did, so firstly i will retract the statement until i find the QUOTE where you did make it.

tim

99% of value has been lost, the company is a disaster. Keep digging a hole or climb out, your choice.

 

[findtim]

man we are soooo different !

they employed thousands of people during those years, they still do but now under the vodaphone banner.

thats what i meant

i look UP, you look DOWN

tim

 

[snoopy]

man we are soooo different !

they employed thousands of people during those years, they still do but now under the vodaphone banner.

thats what i meant

i look UP, you look DOWN

tim

Tim, you're looking down as well. Looking down at a big hole that you are still digging instead of just admitting this company is not "highly successful".

 

[TpD]

Like a Boomerang or Big Arnie........it's back, on the drops today.

 

[Bacon Farmer]

Looks like someone is going to have another bite of...

 

[snoopy]

Netfleet get to sell it twice....great.

This prime name for anyone who makes biscuits and want to call their new brand "biscuit" went for $455 this time versus $556 last time.

"Client requested policy delete" <-- I don't blame them. j/k

 

[Cooper Mills DomainLawyer]

Netfleet get to sell it twice....great.

This prime name for anyone who makes biscuits and want to call their new brand "biscuit" went for $455 this time versus $556 last time.

"Client requested policy delete" <-- I don't blame them. j/k

it was actually a policy delete, not of the registrants choosing

 

[Lucas]

it was actually a policy delete, not of the registrants choosing

Why does this domain keep getting policy deleted? It is very generic - I don't understand.

 

[snoopy]

Why does this domain keep getting policy deleted? It is very generic - I don't understand.

Was the first drop a policy delete or an expiration?

I'm guessing it was the same owner as bread.com.au, if so maybe it was an old ABN or something the first time?

 

[findtim]

Was the first drop a policy delete or an expiration?

I'm guessing it was the same owner as bread.com.au, if so maybe it was an old ABN or something the first time?

i seem to remember it was an expiration.

i agree it is shouldn't have a PD issue

tim

 

[Cooper Mills DomainLawyer]

These PD are usually based on eligibility - that is the most common ground of PD, we dont really see many misspelling policy type PD

 

[duncan22]

Was the first drop a policy delete or an expiration?

I'm guessing it was the same owner as bread.com.au, if so maybe it was an old ABN or something the first time?

Was the same owner as bread.com.au (http://www.gwf.com.au/). The first time each domain expired then two policy deletes for biscuit.com.au.

GWF know someone at the AUDA?