snoopy
Top Contributor
You misunderstand me.
Where is the 200 visits a month going to come from?
You misunderstand me.
That's the only bit you do understand (although disagree!)
Well I'll chime in here. 200 visits a month is if you are #1 on G, but really most days you are always going to be #4 even if you are #1 organically.
a nationwide advertisement would bring a lot more then the 210 exacts that Google metrics shows.
bond cleaning is a in demand needed service,for exit cleans if you want to get your bond back.
like others have already pointed out not all domains follow rule of gakt searches.
When I search for a bond cleaner I generally use my local rag or telephone book not google, as I am sure the majority of Australia does so metrics aren't bad keeping this in mind.
No.1 in the paid section isn't going to produce that either though with 210 searches.
Here is some data on typical CTR's by PPC position, (I'd expect better than that given it is a very commercial term though)
Position Click Through Rate
1 7.94%
2 5.00%
3 2.47%
4 1.96%
5 0.90%
6 0.81%
7 0.91%
8 0.74%
9 0.75%
10 0.20%
http://knowledge.accuracast.com/articles/adwords-clickthrough.php
Why not answer the question instead of dodging it,
Where is the 200 visits a month going to come from?
Why are you quoting Adwords PPC CTR's when we are talking about organic rankings? Oh... because although not relevant they suit your argument better, I see.
Well I'll chime in here. 200 visits a month is if you are #1 on G, but really most days you are always going to be #4 even if you are #1 organically.
I'm not dodging it. Just frustrates me when I answer a question directly sometimes you're so argumentative that you shift like a weaving boxer and start arguing a tangent.
But this is a simple question. Again, I will answer directly.
Where could the target 200 visits/month come from?
I imagine it would be from dozens of unique search terms including but certainly not limited to, search terms containing the terms:
bond cleaners (1,000 phrase)
bond cleaner (140 phrase)
bond cleaning (4,400 phrase)
bond clean (1,000 phrase)
Remember, snoopy, nobody has ever had a website that derives it's traffic solely from one exact search term. Even if you tried it wouldn't work.
Eg my MFA site bikeinsurance.com.au last month received traffic from 234 unique search terms and, despite ranking #1 for 'bike insurance', that was only the 4th biggest term and a relative minor term throughout the report.
Have a look at your sites & see what search terms make up the traffic? It's always surprising how many variations you will see.
Two lessons for you:
1) Don't judge a domain's value solely on metrics especially if you are talking value with respect to a end-user purchase
2) Don't judge a domain's potential traffic solely based on the metrics of it's exact match stats.