What's new

Free Web Host freewebhost.net.au

johno69

Top Contributor
yep not worth regfee was just as easy to set this up as placing a domain in my whypark account..... lol

Why ask people for their opinion if you are just going to argue with it anyway?

Should have just posted "Hey i'm awesome and hand registered this magnificent domain, and don't care what you think"

Try that next time.

I also find the claim that it made money day 1 a bit hard to accept. Reminds me of the $8500 domain from a while back. How did that sale end up?
 

xwdomains

Top Contributor
Why ask people for their opinion if you are just going to argue with it anyway?

Should have just posted "Hey i'm awesome and hand registered this magnificent domain, and don't care what you think"

Try that next time.

I also find the claim that it made money day 1 a bit hard to accept. Reminds me of the $8500 domain from a while back. How did that sale end up?

I agreed the name itself wasn't worth much on its own :rolleyes:

the local phrase search is only 390

It's not hard to rank and make money in 1 day if you know what your doing:rolleyes:

fact is it ranked #20 #13 and pulled in sign ups and got 1 yearly paid signup

and freewebhost.net sold for $1500 domain only....

of course I don't agree it's worth $0 never mentioned what I thought it was worth but if you really want to know I think its probably worth around $100 unless developed and sold as a functioning website making money then I can see it being worth more how much don't know what ever someone wants to pay for it at the time would be a pretty good estimate I would think...
 
Last edited:

xwdomains

Top Contributor
It is ranking 45th for me. As for it potentially making $75,300 in a year? I don't even believe the $24 claim.

ranked at number 11 for free web host

now:cool: not bad

 
Last edited:

davids

Top Contributor
You're logged into google in that screenshot, meaning the site's rank is higher because it knows you visit it more often / you've plus one'd it.

In reality it's in a lower position than that.
 

xwdomains

Top Contributor
You're logged into google in that screenshot, meaning the site's rank is higher because it knows you visit it more often / you've plus one'd it.

In reality it's in a lower position than that.

So I was:eek:

It's Ranked #15 for free web host not logged in



Not bad for less then 48 hours
 

snoopy

Top Contributor
so you don't think it is possible to make 75k a year having your adsense ads on 6300 websites. and that is quite low for a free webhost btw after 12months.

I said I don't think it has any chance of making $75,000 a year, that sounds like something you'd expect to read in a 99 cent ebay auction. I don't even believe the claim that it made $24.
 

xwdomains

Top Contributor

Chris.C

Top Contributor
I agreed the name itself wasn't worth much on its own
Um this statement says it all.

We are on a "domaining" forum - the ONLY thing that matters is the value of the DOMAIN.

If you think you can make money the development of these sorts of domains then I HIGHLY recommend you buy hundreds of domains just like this and start developing them. That's called scaling up - and if it works at scale you actually have yourself a BUSINESS, it's just that you won't be in the business of "domaining" you'll be in the business of "development".


Why ask people for their opinion if you are just going to argue with it anyway?
Agreed.

Whilst everyone has a right to their opinion, there is no point in asking other people's opinions if you have no intention of listening to it.

That said, like all investors, domainers make their money not buying based on the opinion of others (get enough opinions in one place and you have a market) rather they make their money by seeing value where the market does not.

Now the way I see it is as a "domain investors" you are basing your investment decisions not on the domains value but rather your ability to develop marginal domains and make money, this is a riskier strategy, but it may well be a winning formula, but you are carrying a lot of risk from a domaining perspective because your domain has next to no value by itself, which means you have no margin for safety, because all your costs will be sunk.

If your strategy had of been applied to the domain freewebhost.COM.au which was also hand regged, you could say, hey I hand regged this domain, but I'm going to try and maximise my return via development, but if that fails the domain itself is still worth $XXX. So there is a margin of safety in this strategy because if the development fails you can still liquidate the domain for a profit.

With all that said, I think you should have a go at it, maybe all the nay sayers are wrong, but I have my doubts about it's ability to scale.

Best of luck.
 

findtim

Top Contributor
Um this statement says it all.

We are on a "domaining" forum - the ONLY thing that matters is the value of the DOMAIN.

Well there is a "development" section on the forum so to say "we are..." is almost racist ! and to top it of with "ONLY" is shortsighted in my view.

I think the balance/difference between the 2 is very beneficial to all, your words suggested to me that you were taking the "high ground" and if you have to develop a domain then you are a second class citizen.

i think the end aguement here is its posted in "appraisals" and that is all it should have been but its now got off track and perhaps belows in the "development " discussion area.

tim
 

Chris.C

Top Contributor
Well there is a "development" section on the forum so to say "we are..." is almost racist ! and to top it of with "ONLY" is shortsighted in my view.
Actually I'm not anti development at all - I actually do quite a lot of it and I think the "domainers" that aren't at least dabbling in it are a bit behind the times.

Thus the reason I was mildly supportive of xwdomains, because I think money CAN be made doing what he's doing, I just think he's better off doing it with better domains than the one he's using.

:rolleyes:

Please note, that I'm not saying domainers that don't develop can't make money, obviously most big domainers in AU acquired their portfolios a long while ago and they definitely are not decreasing in value or anything - I just think acquiring domains is and will continue to become harder as a pure domainers because they'll be increasingly competing with buyers who are willing to develop, and who therefore have the ability to produce a higher ROI from a domain which will allow for a higher initial acquisition price which will make it hard for pure domainers to compete with.

And for the record I came into domaining late, from a background in SEO and web development, so I don't consider myself a "domainer" either.

I think the balance/difference between the 2 is very beneficial to all, your words suggested to me that you were taking the "high ground" and if you have to develop a domain then you are a second class citizen.
Not at all, but if you want to call yourself a "domainer" that's what you need to do.
 

snoopy

Top Contributor
Well there is a "development" section on the forum so to say "we are..." is almost racist ! and to top it of with "ONLY" is shortsighted in my view.

lol This is the funniest thing I've read in a while. How the heck is that "almost racist"? It has nothing to do with racism. Next we'll be telling people they are almost racist if they don't like whoppers,

Sir, do not talk down whoppers, keep it to yourself, that is almost racist.

We are making business decisions here, trying to make money from domains, bringing up the fact that the domain in the key element and that key element is bad is obviously important.
 

Community sponsors

Domain Parking Manager

AddMe Reputation Management

Digital Marketing Experts

Catch Expired Domains

Web Hosting

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
11,106
Messages
92,078
Members
2,394
Latest member
Spacemo
Top