I can't for the life of me understand why so often people want to keep their sales or purchases quiet (I'm talking about domainers here, who presumably want to see growth in the industry)
IMO, these 'undisclosed transactions' hurt the industry as they limit data on values and pricing but moreso suggest that the market is more illiquid than it really is.
Transparency in the domain aftermarket makes a huge difference - imagine what it would be like without the public dropping domain data, SEDO's results, DNjournal, IDNX even. It would be really hard to benchmark one's own domains and potential purchases and hard to get end-users to appreciate domain value.
Here are the theories I have as to why people do this:
1) The sale never happened. It's just a buyer or seller bignoting themselves by inventing a meaty sale that never happened
2) Some people get off on the mystery of it all. They like to sound cool by making the deal sound like an exclusive underground transaction - 'Sorry would love to tell you but all parties have signed a mutual Non Disclosure Agreement blah blah BS BS"
3) Some people aren't confident that they got a good deal. They are worried that if the sale were public, they might be criticised for selling too low or paying too much
4) Maybe some worry that by revealing how much they paid or sold might reveal their 'modus operandi' and compromise future deals or create more competition.
I don't see any substance to any of the above theories if they do indeed exist.
There are only 2 cases I can see where a domainer may have a genuine interest in keeping a transaction private:
1) It's a 'naughty' name (eg they have sold Gooogle.com.au to Google!!)
2) The buyer bought it for the sole purpose of flipping it and doesn't want a recorded sale price to hurt negotiations with a lined up buyer.
But other than that, I can't see any reason. There are lots of sales like this, often significant, which go unreported and therefore hurt us all.
So, fess up, you shy sellers & buyers. Why do you do it? What am I missing? Or, is it really not a big deal and makes no difference to the industry?
IMO, these 'undisclosed transactions' hurt the industry as they limit data on values and pricing but moreso suggest that the market is more illiquid than it really is.
Transparency in the domain aftermarket makes a huge difference - imagine what it would be like without the public dropping domain data, SEDO's results, DNjournal, IDNX even. It would be really hard to benchmark one's own domains and potential purchases and hard to get end-users to appreciate domain value.
Here are the theories I have as to why people do this:
1) The sale never happened. It's just a buyer or seller bignoting themselves by inventing a meaty sale that never happened
2) Some people get off on the mystery of it all. They like to sound cool by making the deal sound like an exclusive underground transaction - 'Sorry would love to tell you but all parties have signed a mutual Non Disclosure Agreement blah blah BS BS"
3) Some people aren't confident that they got a good deal. They are worried that if the sale were public, they might be criticised for selling too low or paying too much
4) Maybe some worry that by revealing how much they paid or sold might reveal their 'modus operandi' and compromise future deals or create more competition.
I don't see any substance to any of the above theories if they do indeed exist.
There are only 2 cases I can see where a domainer may have a genuine interest in keeping a transaction private:
1) It's a 'naughty' name (eg they have sold Gooogle.com.au to Google!!)
2) The buyer bought it for the sole purpose of flipping it and doesn't want a recorded sale price to hurt negotiations with a lined up buyer.
But other than that, I can't see any reason. There are lots of sales like this, often significant, which go unreported and therefore hurt us all.
So, fess up, you shy sellers & buyers. Why do you do it? What am I missing? Or, is it really not a big deal and makes no difference to the industry?