Doble Korona
Member
In nowadays, a Phoneword such as 1300 WIDGET is a 90’s product that is practically phasing out and being replaced by features such as Click-to-Call from your smartphone (4 out 5 smartphone users now use Click-to-Call).
A Phoneword is also of no use when using the voice dial feature. For example, a Phoneword cannot be recognised when trying to voice dial using voice assistants such as Siri, Cortana, Alexa, Google Assistant, etc.
However, if we were to use a matching Phoneword domain such as “1300widget.com.au”, then the Phoneword domain would appear at the top of the search results, Click-to-Call would be enabled and the Phoneword domain may be alternatively used for redirection to the customer’s main website.
As far as valuation is concerned, would be it be too ambitious to say that the Phoneword domain is of equal or of higher value than a standalone Phoneword? If 1300 WIDGET is worth let’s say $25,000, how would we evaluate the matching Phoneword domain against the current market value of the Phoneword?
A Phoneword is also of no use when using the voice dial feature. For example, a Phoneword cannot be recognised when trying to voice dial using voice assistants such as Siri, Cortana, Alexa, Google Assistant, etc.
However, if we were to use a matching Phoneword domain such as “1300widget.com.au”, then the Phoneword domain would appear at the top of the search results, Click-to-Call would be enabled and the Phoneword domain may be alternatively used for redirection to the customer’s main website.
As far as valuation is concerned, would be it be too ambitious to say that the Phoneword domain is of equal or of higher value than a standalone Phoneword? If 1300 WIDGET is worth let’s say $25,000, how would we evaluate the matching Phoneword domain against the current market value of the Phoneword?