Yeah $8000 is a good result.
Yet at the same time I can't help but feel that $8000 is a drop in the ocean when it comes to selling farm equipment.
With farm equipment ranging from $10,000 to $250,000 it would only take a couple of sales to recoup this $8000 investment.
This is the sort of domain you could build a full scale business around.
$8000 in the big scheme of things is a steal.
This is a high price for the current market. More like what might have been expected 18 months ago. I wonder who the underbidder was to push it that far?
I think there is really only 1 clear enduser buyer, the people who bought it (because of farmmachinerysales.com.au). Maybe the underbidder was a domainer hoping for misdirected traffic?
18 months ago I would have agreed, but these days the farmers are getting pretty savvy too.Agree its worth the buy, but the thing is most people who sell Farm Equipment probably do it via traditional media still. Don't get me wrong you have the new age farmers coming up but they are not just their yet.
Moral of the story, 80% of farmers have spoken to someone just like you in the last 24 months and are recognizing the internet for what it is.Moral of the story 80% of people in farms probably still love traditional media due to location.
If I, a web developer with only moderate experience in machinery sales marketing, was ready to throw a couple of grand at it, an independent farm machinery dealer should have been will to spend $XX,XXX.This is a high price for the current market. More like what might have been expected 18 months ago. I wonder who the underbidder was to push it that far?
1 clear endusers?!?I think there is really only 1 clear enduser buyer, the people who bought it (because of farmmachinerysales.com.au). Maybe the underbidder was a domainer hoping for misdirected traffic?
This is a high price for the current market. More like what might have been expected 18 months ago. I wonder who the underbidder was to push it that far?
I think there is really only 1 clear enduser buyer, the people who bought it (because of farmmachinerysales.com.au). Maybe the underbidder was a domainer hoping for misdirected traffic?
If I, a web developer with only moderate experience in machinery sales marketing, was ready to throw a couple of grand at it, an independent farm machinery dealer should have been will to spend $XX,XXX.
If I owned an established farm equipment dealership and I lost that domain for only $8000 I'd sack my marketing manager.
1 clear endusers?!?
There are hundreds of farm machinery dealers in the country!
Remember we sold wine.com.au? We also sold other 4 letter domains for example keno.com.au.
So placing a proxy in the last 10 seconds is the winning strategy?
1. No early bids to draw attention to it.
2. Chaser bidders only get 1 or 2 chances to find your bid amount.
Whether wine.com.au sold for high 5 figures or low 6 figures isn't the point.Same old story, "don't tell me there is only 2 reported .com.au sales over 10k this year, because I know at least 2 other unreported ones".
The fact is there is only 2 reported .com.au sales in 5 figures, both at the very low end, and lighting.com.au was a much stronger name than farmmachinery.com.au.
The chance of a fairly good quality, but not amazing .com.au like this getting 5 figures is remote. What is reported tells the story.
And how does farmmachinery.com.au compare to wine.com.au or keno.com.au? Not very well.
If wine.com.au sold for 5 figures, I'd say that is further evidence of just how poor the .com.au market is. And that isn't sour grapes.
Lets nip this in the bud, there where no marketing initiatives.As we all know, a "motivated underbidder" is required to ensure a decent end result on drop auctions - unless of course there have been "marketing initiatives" employed by the drop catcher.
I am not really sure what manual bidding is but this is an interesting auction history to look at. It looks like all three parties where winning the bidding at one point in time during the final 15 seconds so if any one of them had failed to get a final bid in the results could have been very different. This is the most exciting type of auction to see and three motivated buyers certainly does liven things up.What I found interesting was that there was not one but two underbidders on this domain (Users 7 and 8). So I guess it must be a sought after niche.
If you look at the bidding history, they really pushed CarSales (User 3) up in the last 30 seconds.
It appears as if CarSales was bidding manually until they decided with 9 seconds to go to put in a large proxy. User 8 then made two separate manual bids within the last 5 seconds.
Here is a link to the bidding history: http://www.netfleet.com.au/auction-history/?sid=1059548
I note CarSales already own equipmentsales.com.au.
Lets nip this in the bud, there where no marketing initiatives.
It is that time of the month ;-)We are sensitive today aren't we. Once again, I better put a wink.
I am genuinely interested though if your telemarketers did approach other endusers - and if this is what caused the interest and bidding?