i will be bringing this up to the board, i am also mindful of the consequences of every decision made by the board, and even as a demand class elected director i do see that how decisions about 1-5yr, cor, monetisation etc affect both sides of the coin.
which part of 3.2 would you like me to ignore? ignore B and just go with D ?
i suppose the real answer starts with drop and NF, with very few days to go i'd be making sure the ship stays floating rather then changing a perfectly good yardarm.
tim
Lets hope we see it on the public auDA Board agenda and public minutes Tim.. Can you guarantee this?
When will you "be bringing this up with the board" exactly and we want to see it actually publicly minuted thanks.
You seem to not be understanding this fully especially the Consumer rights, the highlighted Constitution clauses auDA and others have so often ignored, how it works overseas with other drop catchers etc aspects.
The benefit is for Supply, auDA, Afilias and .au domain name Consumers.
As a demand class Director I want to see you more engaged again with demand class members and making sure these items and others raised are on the auDA Board agendas and public minutes so we can see what actually is actioned, who votes for what if anything etc.
People have very low confidence auDA or the Board is listening or providing back proper responses or making items ever discussed or actioned on the auDA Board Agenda and Minutes.
The auDA Board spending time talking about their vote for $170,000 a year for this auDA "not for profits" Directors and not fixing issues and questions such as this shows the focus of auDA Management and the Board is still not right.
1 year by default will see far more of the dropping names bid on and registered...auDA, Afilias, Supply benefits.