What's new

auDA threatens SGM & Members with Court

DomainNames

Top Contributor
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: auDA Membership <membership@auda.org.au>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018, 6:04 PM
Subject: Response to requisitioned meeting

Dear auDA Members,

Response to requisitioned meeting

After careful consideration of the request, the Board has formed the view that it is in the best interests of the organisation and its members to hold the requested Special General Meeting (SGM) on the same day as auDA's Annual General Meeting (AGM).

The Board will work to hold the AGM at the earliest practicable time after the audited financial statements for the period ending 30 June 2018 are complete, expected to be at the earliest, mid September 2018. We explain the reasons which have led us to form that view below .

We seek your agreement to postpone the requested SGM to the same day as auDA's 2018 AGM.

If the Board does not receive sufficient agreement from members to an extension of time to call and hold the SGM by 4.00pm Monday 23 April 2018, the Board intends to apply for a court order pursuant to section 1322(4) of the Corporations Act extending the time for calling the requested SGM.

In the interests of transparency and to ensure that all members are fully informed of these issues, we intend to distribute this letter to all auDA members.

Timing of the requested SGM

There are two key reasons for holding the requested SGM at the same time as auDA's AGM.

Firstly, on 18 April 2018, the Department of Communication and the Arts (DoCA) published its report following a review into auDA's .au domain registration endorsement (the DoCA Review).

The DoCA Review places auDA at a critical point of reform. The Board is currently in the process of considering its options and determining the best way to raise those matters with its members. Some of the reforms proposed by the DoCA Review will fundamentally affect auDA's governance and structure, and require serious consideration before they can be put to members in a meaningful way. The Board has resolved to engage meaningfully with members around any constitutional reforms borne out of the DOCA Review, prior to recommending to members a new Constitution for adoption.

Constitutional reform requires the approval of members and therefore will necessarily require close consultation with members. The Board does not believe that consideration of the resolutions to remove three independent directors in the interim will assist auDA and its members to properly consider the DOCA Review or the reforms required, or achieve meaningful change in the long-term future or governance of auDA.

Further, given the DoCA Review was only published on 18 April 2018, it is not possible to bring to the members a full picture of auDA's position, including any necessary reforms, in the time period by which the SGM must be called and held unless there is an extension of time. The Board is concerned to ensure that the right of the members to elect and remove directors is always exercised in a manner that is fully informed by all of the circumstances of the company. Only by considering the requested resolutions alongside necessary reforms will members be able to exercise their rights with a full picture of auDA and its future.

The Board is also concerned to ensure that it is not under-resourced at a critical time in the organisation's history, noting that the process to select and secure independent directors to replace any removed by members will take some time and may be difficult in light of the uncertainty around auDA's continued management of the .au domain space as a result of the DoCA Review.


Second, the cost to auDA of calling and holding a SGM is substantial. By way of illustration, auDA incurred almost $70,000 in costs in addition to the time and administrative resources expended by auDA staff and disruption to business in calling and holding an SGM on 31 July 2017.

Extending the period of time to call and hold the requested SGM until the date of the AGM will avoid the substantial cost and inconvenience of calling multiple general meetings in 2018 and will allow the board and members to focus on reforms required by the DOCA Review, including a considerable member engagement process.

Members' reasons for calling the requested SGM

The Board recognises the need to address the issues which members have raised in relation to (a) auDA's policy regarding direct .au domain name registration, and (b) communication, transparency and good governance more broadly. However, these issues do not make the holding of the requested SGM time critical.

The Board acknowledges the considerable debate amongst the members and the internet community over the merits of a change to its policy in relation to direct .au domain name registration.

As advised in our letter to all members dated 18 April 2018, auDA has resolved to delay any change to its policy on direct registration until the 2019 calendar year. This will allow time for implementation of the reform package discussed above as well as further engagement with the community on the merits of the policy. It will also allow the requested resolutions to remove certain directors be put to the members prior to the board's consideration of whether to implement direct registration.

Likewise, the Board acknowledges that good governance requires open and transparent engagement with its members. However, this is a key focus of the DOCA Review, and will be addressed by auDA in the process of responding to the DOCA Review in the weeks and months to come. In our view, it will not be assisted by holding the requested SGM before auDA's AGM later this year.

The directors of auDA are fully committed to ensuring that auDA is run in a manner that fairly and appropriately represents its members and achieves its objects, particularly at a time of critical reform.

Having regard to all of the above, we ask that you notify the Board by email to engagement@auda.org.au by no later than 4.00pm on Monday 23 April 2018 that you agree to an extension of time to hold the requested SGM on the same day as auDA's Annual General Meeting (AGM), to be held in late September 2018.

In doing so, you will help to ensure the proper governance of auDA and avoid the substantial unnecessary costs and disruption of a separate SGM.

Yours faithfully
.au Domain Administration Limited
Hasaka Martin
Company Secretary
As directed by the Board of auDA
 

DomainNames

Top Contributor
auDA where are the Board Agenda's and Minutes you promised from the last SGM?
What has improved really? How can you be trusted to change before the next AGM or ever?
"2017 auDA Board Minutes and Agendas now on Website
Posted by auDA on 8 August 2017

As noted in the Board Communique last Thursday 3 August 2017 and consistent with our commitment to our members, we have reinstated the 2017 Board Minutes (up until June 2017, with subsequent Board Minutes to be posted in due course) and agendas. They can be found on the auDA Board Meetings page."


https://www.auda.org.au/about-auda/our-org/board-meetings/

2017
Board Meeting Agenda Minutes
13 February 2017 PDF PDF
24 April 2017 PDF PDF
22 May 2017 PDF PDF
19 June 2017 PDF PDF
24 July 2017 PDF PDF
31 July 2017 NOTHING PDF
2 August 2017 NOTHING PDF
14 August 2017 PDF PDF
16 August 2017 NOTHING PDF
21 August 2017 PDF PDF
6 September 2017 NOTHING PDF
26 September 2017 PDF PDF
23 October 2017 PDF PDF
26 October 2017 NOTHING PDF
13 November 2017 NOTHING NOTHING
12 December 2017 NOTHING PDF
18 December 2017 NOTHING PDF

auDA Board Meeting Schedule 2018

Board Meeting Agendas Minutes
13 February 2018 NOTHING NOTHING
26 March 2018 NOTHING NOTHING
May 1, 2017
"All previous Board Minutes and Agendas have been taken down. This is despite an assurance at the auDA AGM in November from Stuart Benjamin (Chair, auDA) and Cameron Boardman (CEO) that communication and transparency with Members would improve. "

Transfer of Authority for the .au ccTLD Report on auDA's Achievements and Capacity to Manage Domain Names in Australia 9 October 2000

"The auDA Board strives to ensure that it conducts business in an open and accountable manner, including regularly publishing minutes of meetings and making all relevant documents available to members and the general public."
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DomainNames

Top Contributor

If the Board does not receive sufficient agreement from members to an extension of time to call and hold the SGM by 4.00pm Monday 23 April 2018, the Board intends to apply for a court order pursuant to section 1322(4) of the Corporations Act extending the time for calling the requested SGM.

Let them do the court order.

auDA Members, The global media, Government and a lot of stakeholders who are pi$$ed off already with auDA antics will not like that much.

A massive crowdfunding global campaign would be taken up.

The judge might also raise concerns what is going on at auDA....

Where any threats made to anyone to pull the SGM ..... or else?

Now more than ever the Government needs to step in. Enough is enough.

How much has auDA spent on avoidable legal fees in the last 2 years from problems they seem to always be creating?


www.Grumpier.com.au
 
Last edited:

Bacon Farmer

Top Contributor
Nah I meant it's the board's problem. Stuff them.

This is what you get when you don't listen.
 
Last edited:

DomainNames

Top Contributor
auDA Bully tactics now again .....using up all of the stockpiled piggy bank auDA $millions and totally not focused on the actual .au namespace management or the issues.

Where are the public Minutes auDA again ? What are you hiding again since the last SGM?

"www.Grumpier.com.au
Good Governance
  • Why has the auDA board allowed Demand Class members to be under-represented since November 2017? That’s contrary to the auDA Constitution.
  • Staff and Director attrition has continued to be mind boggling since the previous SGM for such a small organisation. For instance, why did Di Parker leave as auDA Corporate Secretary? Why did Simon Johnson suddenly resign as a Director last November?
  • Have friends or previous colleagues of the CEO been appointed to plum positions within the organisation? If so, were these positions first advertised?
  • The long standing Registry Operator is about to be replaced, but what real benefit will flow to registrars or registrants? By some reports, the wholesale price has decreased by around 60%, but registrars apparently are only going to get around a 10% discount. If true, this seems a pittance – what happens to the balance? Many people think this is no more than a cash grab by auDA. Why did they do it this way? Could it be deemed as a “double cash grab” if direct registrations are approved?
  • New independent director Suzanne Ewart has been made chair of the auDA board Security and Risk sub-committee. What relevant experience does she have in this most important discipline?
  • Sandra Hook is the longest serving Independent, but what has she done about any of the above? What relevant domain industry experience does she have?
  • Does all of this indicate a potentially systemic problem for our Membership organisation? This is all happening on their watch.
  • We believe there needs to be some positive and effective change – which is why we are proposing the following resolutions:
Resolution 1 – Vote of no confidence in Cameron Boardman (CEO)
Resolution 2 – Removal of Chris Leptos as a Director
Resolution 3 – Removal of Sandra Hook as a Director
Resolution 4 – Removal of Suzanne Ewart as a Director"
 
Last edited:

Lemon

Top Contributor
Thanks Sean,
Glad you could provide us all with the details of all those that called for the SGM.
As one, actually two, of those signatures you personally must agree to the change in date.
Now you can stand up and be counted, the ball is in your hands. Or you can be a quitter.
 

DomainNames

Top Contributor
Thanks Sean,
Glad you could provide us all with the details of all those that called for the SGM.
As one, actually two, of those signatures you personally must agree to the change in date.
Now you can stand up and be counted, the ball is in your hands. Or you can be a quitter.

Ian ( or is it 'dogs' today) you keep shooting yourself in the foot and embarrassing yourself ..

I did not call for the SGM. Have you been reading anything?

The 3 people who called and signed for the SGM told everyone who they where and why they called it, read the 30 plus media stories and their posts on this forum.

https://www.dntrade.com.au/threads/auda-sgm-2018-grumpier-com-au.11823/#post-91827
It’s time for auDA to listen to members concerns.

If you agree, please sign this petition for a Special General Meeting.

https://grumpier.com.au/

Josh Rowe, Paul Szyndler & Jim Stewart


Sign the petition for an auDA Special General Meeting

As everyone knows they have been personally targeted for calling the SGM and quite possibly have been threatened to pull the SGM or else.... I think this is disgraceful.. but what else can we all expect by now?

It certainly doesn't show the Government that auDA's current Management and some Board members are really prepared to change does it?

They are prepared to spend auDA's not for profit money to fight to stay in their roles ( and their associated $$) instead of taking the hint is it time for them to move on graciously.
 
Last edited:

Lemon

Top Contributor
I did not call for the SGM. Have you been reading anything?
Sean,
If you want to play with the big boys you should realise you legal responsibilities.
It takes 5% of Members to call for an SGM. That is not 3 people.
Your signature on the S249 means that you are legally responsible for the calling of the SGM.
That means that you personally must respond to the email requesting change and you personally are accountable for any requests from auDA.
It also means that you personally are liable for any costs that may be incurred.
That goes for every single person that signed the original call for an SGM and that is why you, and the 22 other signees would have received a copy of the notice.
You asked for it so now you must take responsibility.
I suggest you should talk to your legal team.
 

Cheyne

Top Contributor
As everyone knows they have been personally targeted for calling the SGM and quite possibly have been threatened to pull the SGM or else.... I think this is disgraceful.. but what else can we all expect by now?

This is the first time I've heard of this. Where is the proof? As in, written or any other physical evidence, not hearsay.
 

DomainNames

Top Contributor
Sean,
If you want to play with the big boys you should realise you legal responsibilities.
It takes 5% of Members to call for an SGM. That is not 3 people.
Your signature on the S249 means that you are legally responsible for the calling of the SGM.
That means that you personally must respond to the email requesting change and you personally are accountable for any requests from auDA.
It also means that you personally are liable for any costs that may be incurred.
That goes for every single person that signed the original call for an SGM and that is why you, and the 22 other signees would have received a copy of the notice.
You asked for it so now you must take responsibility.
I suggest you should talk to your legal team.

You are hilarious....
 

Lemon

Top Contributor
Is that your learned legal opinion?

I'd suggest you stick to being bitter and twisted.
I don't care what you do. Your problem.
Like I said you are playing in the big league now.
You all made the choice and have to deal with the consequences.
Just like I made mine last year. (That is right I have never stood for anything)
Take ownership.
 

DomainNames

Top Contributor
This is the first time I've heard of this. Where is the proof? As in, written or any other physical evidence, not hearsay.

How did you go with checking if anyone from auDA Registrar Ventraip / Synergy Wholesale has applied for auDA Demand Class Director roles?
 

DomainNames

Top Contributor
Seriously Sean.

Ian go easy on the juice tonight before posting..

I dare say the SGM crowd have excellent advice.... and a lot of Pro Bono offers already from the big end of the Legal Fraternity..

Looks like we may hear some BIG news Monday.... I have my doubts some people will make it to the SGM even if it is delayed via tactics and wasting more auDA money.

Probably just a matter now of negotiating the $ or should I say $$,$$$,$$$ ?
 
Last edited:

DomainNames

Top Contributor
Second, the cost to auDA of calling and holding a SGM is substantial. By way of illustration, auDA incurred almost $70,000 in costs in addition to the time and administrative resources expended by auDA staff and disruption to business in calling and holding an SGM on 31 July 2017.

Yours faithfully
.au Domain Administration Limited
Hasaka Martin
Company Secretary
As directed by the Board of auDA

  1. What are the costs to not do it?
  2. What are the potential savings on auDA ( and .au domain name consumers) to do the SGM and for them to be removed?.... This could be a significant amount far in excess of this sum?
  3. Where are the promised Board Agendas and Minutes promised after the last SGM? Why are they still either non existent or heavily redacted to keep crucial ( not confidential) things from Members and the Public.
  4. There seem to be a vast amount of other reasons to proceed many people are aware of.
  5. How much was spent by auDA funding the .TL domain namespace Timor Leste project and Consultant from auDA funds? This is totally outside of the authorised role of auDA as management of the .au namespace and the auDA Constitution. Did auDA use over $100,000 of auDA funds or how much and why?
https://www.auda.org.au/news/auda-a...acity-building-project-in-the-pacific-region/

auDA (.au Domain Administration Ltd) together with the Government of Timor-Leste and APTLD (Asia Pacific Top Level Domain Association) are today pleased to announce the signing of a ground-breaking joint venture between the parties. Together, these three organisations have agreed to work toward and assist the further development of the .tl ccTLD, its policies and functions.

auDA have committed to assisting Timor-Leste to create a vision, strategy and policies as well as a capacity and technology project for .tl As part of the scope this project will consider building capacity for a robust and sustainable ccTLD to benefit the Timor-Leste people, including looking at the operational development of the registry.

auDA has pledged to provide the project funding and to support the engagement of industry expert, Samantha Dickinson, to lead the project on the ground.

The CEO of auDA, Cameron Boardman said – “we have been in discussions with APTLD and Timor-Leste since my first APTLD meeting in late 2016 around how best we can support our Pacific neighbours through capacity building. Today marks the realisation of our successful engagement with Eng. Nicolau Santos Celestino, Director of Information and Technology in Timor-Leste and APTLD to provide a knowledge and expertise sharing initiative to enhance the ccTLD community within the region. We hope this will be the start of many other, similar joint ventures across the APTLD network.”
"auDA has pledged to provide the project funding and to support the engagement of industry expert, Samantha Dickinson, to lead the project on the ground."

We hope this will be the start of many other, similar joint ventures across the APTLD network.
 
Last edited:

Community sponsors

Domain Parking Manager

AddMe Reputation Management

Digital Marketing Experts

Catch Expired Domains

Web Hosting

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
11,106
Messages
92,078
Members
2,394
Latest member
Spacemo
Top