Menu
What's new
By:
Filters

NAB acquires nab.com

snoopy

snoopy

Top Contributor
The movement towards .com continues to creep along and will probably hasten with .au creating confusion and weakening the au cctld. AUDA got it badly wrong focusing on new tlds as a major threat. Too much time at ICANN meetings and listening to Ausregistry nonsense.

I would guess another of the big 4 will shift within 5-10 years, this is following the cba.com acquisition and now this. AUDA is largely blind to what really needs to happen to keep the namespace strong.

$2.5 million sounds a completely made up number though by Robert.
 
DomainNames

DomainNames

Top Contributor
The "journalist" quotes the old owner as a "cybersquater" but clearly that is not factual based on the previous National Australia Bank's failed attempts to Reverse Domain Name Hijack the NAB.COM name with no success and claims of "cybersquating" at no time standing up.

The owner held the name for over 20 years!

http://www.afr.com/business/banking...tomers-to-adult-website-owner-20170109-gto2ta

This shows the uneducated mindset still prevalent and failed thinking for some reason that an Australian bank is the only rightful owner to a 3 letter global .com name...

Great news for the seller if it was $2.5 million. I heard it was more than this from some sources..Maybe someone will dig deeper and find out. The National Australia Bank spends more than this on their various christmas parties so it's still small money. They probably spend that on weekly advertising.

No pity for the thieving banks..or any RDNH lawyer or RDNH Complainant...
 
Scott.L

Scott.L

Top Contributor
DomainNames said:
The "journalist" quotes the old owner as a "cybersquater" but clearly that is not factual based on the previous National Australia Bank's failed attempts to Reverse Domain Name Hijack the NAB.COM name with no success and claims of "cybersquating" at no time standing up.

The owner held the name for over 20 years!

http://www.afr.com/business/banking...tomers-to-adult-website-owner-20170109-gto2ta

This shows the uneducated mindset still prevalent and failed thinking for some reason that an Australian bank is the only rightful owner to a 3 letter global .com name...

Great news for the seller if it was $2.5 million. I heard it was more than this from some sources..Maybe someone will dig deeper and find out. The National Australia Bank spends more than this on their various christmas parties so it's still small money. They probably spend that on weekly advertising.

No pity for the thieving banks..or any RDNH lawyer or RDNH Complainant...
Click to expand...

yeah, the journalist was probably born 2001 and has only just become aware of domain names 2015
 
snoopy

snoopy

Top Contributor
DomainNames said:
Great news for the seller if it was $2.5 million. I heard it was more than this from some sources..Maybe someone will dig deeper and find out. The National Australia Bank spends more than this on their various christmas parties so it's still small money. They probably spend that on weekly advertising.
Click to expand...

Likely to be NDA so what is the chance of any of those numbers being based on real information?

Just as an example someone could say "It apparently sold for $5 million" and that would soon spread as though it were a real number. As long as the price is high people want to believe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Community sponsors

Domain Parking Manager

AddMe Reputation Management

Digital Marketing Experts

Catch Expired Domains

Web Hosting

Members online

Total: 184 (members: 2, guests: 182)

Forum statistics

Threads
11,106
Messages
92,078
Members
2,394
Latest member
Spacemo

Share this page

Top