snoopy
Top Contributor
How do you propose auDA could spend money to create more desirable com.au domain names?
In terms of your analogy, if the old lady can only source enough ingredients to make a dozen chocolate cupcakes, but she can also source ingredients to make a dozen of the less popular vanilla, shouldn't she make both? Maybe the vanilla are much more profitable? Maybe she makes as much money from the three vanilla cupcakes she sells as she does from the dozen chocolate. Who knows?!
She should stop making Vanilla and make more Chocolate. It is all about trying to make something work when in reality nobody really wants it. Instead of trying to push the losers they'd be better off pushing the winners.
You're assuming she has access to more chocolate and that she's not benefiting at all from offering vanilla as an alternative.
I'm guessing this lady was not exhausting the worlds supply of chocolate in her kitchen.
adding the net.au space effectively doubles the availability of desirable names. All that's different between the two is your (and most peoples') perception, which is what auDA should attempt to change. I totally accept the problems with branding and the confusion of having two different websites using the same name on two different 2LDs, but, functionally, the two 2LDs are identical.
It does not double the availability of desirable domain names, because .net.au is not desirable.
The difference between .com.au and .net.au is that .com.au is the default extension in Australia. It is the A4 of domain world. Doesn't matter why people use it, the fact is they do.
AUDA is wasting their time trying to change anyone's perception because what most people think is "right". If 99% of people thinking chocolate is better than vanilla then give them chocolate, no point trying to convince them vanilla is better.