sex.com for sale

[DavidL]

http://www.elliotsblog.com/sex-com-...re-auction-63812/comment-page-1#comment-18900

soj - you're the resident big spender. How about it?

EDIT - Noticed Oz. beat me to it with the scoop and even cracked the same joke lol. Anyway probably worth a thread of it's own anyway.

 

[hadhad]

...

 

[soj]

I remember reading the DN Journal cover story on this a year or two ago, ruined the guys life nearly, and it looks like its sent another company broke, might be a cursed domain, looks like ill be staying away, would rather put my $20mil into this http://www.megayachtnews.org/content/images/stories/boats/sunseeker_predator_108.jpg

 

[Oz.]

Nice! When's our domainfest going to be on your mega yacht?

 

[Oz.]

EDIT - Noticed Oz. beat me to it w... Definitely worth a thread of its own though.

 

[Data Glasses]

you can have holographicsex.com for ?

does netfleet own this name ........he has placed it in the marketplace ?

 

[DavidL]

Looks like the auction scheduled for tomorrow (which was no reserve btw) will not happen. Email from Sedo below:

Sedo just learned that an Involuntary Chapter 11 petition has been filed against Escom, owner of the Sex.com domain name.

This could mean the scheduled foreclosure auction of the domain, Sex.com, will not take place tomorrow as previously planned.

Sedo will keep you informed of any further updates regarding this breaking news.

For more information please reference the official press release below:

Involuntary Chapter 11 Petition Filed Against Escom, LLC - Owner of the Sex.com Domain Name

Woodland Hills, California - Creditors of Escom, LLC ("Escom") today filed an involuntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition against Escom in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California (San Fernando Valley Division).

Petitioners took this action to protect their interests and to maximize value for all other creditors and equity holders. The filing will stay the public auction foreclosure proceedings previously scheduled for March 18, 2010, which petitioners believe would have diminished the value of Escom's assets.