findtim
Top Contributor
Who Paid?
lets look at this piece of the FOI from the knowledge everyone knows.
the FOI is asking for documentation on member payments, a very good question, it will be a clever bookkeeper to get around that one.
the constitution says payment with application, so there will need to be 955 payment references, if there isn't then that to me becomes a voting agreement, it doesn't get any harder then that really.
its not hard to achieve: https://www.auda.org.au/about-auda/membership/auda-online-membership-application/ you pay on the 2nd page.
or did 955 people write a cheque and post it in?
or did 955 do a direct deposit?
were there 955 faxes/emails?
surely someone in the industry is familiar with online banking? paypal?
i saw there is a rumour many members haven't paid yet? if thats the case the constitution doesn't provide a "payment plan" on membership so those 955 ( or part there of) will need to be cancelled and put to the board again once payment is received, looks like we are heading for a very late AGM this year or richard bullock do you just ignore this one as well and let auda continue to break the rules?
-----------------------
Note: Please include your Member Name in the reference/note so we can correctly identify your payment
Please Note: Cut-off for receipt of application and payment for submission to next scheduled Board meeting is 7 calendar days prior. Applications and payments received after the cut-off date will be submitted to the following scheduled Board meeting.
If for any reason your membership application is rejected, the entrance fee will be refunded in full.
------------------------------
it seems VERY clear that payment has to be made prior to your application being presented to the board.
are the rumours true?
i said when i resigned that there will be decisions i didn't want my name on but i really didn't think there would be this many ! and there are more to come before we hit the GM.
Its another question for the CMWG to ask, all your hard work will be undone if invalid members are allowed to vote. if the cmwg have the membership model right then the 955 will vote themselves out after they create a mess:
1) they vote all the other resolutions in
2) they vote themselves out
3) supply lose their leverage on auda
4) supply lose their marketing promise ( watch this space )
5) the board votes for its own board nominations committee to vote for itself ! but if i was on the board right now i'd be looking for a new position when they reduce the numbers and increase the independents.
tim
lets look at this piece of the FOI from the knowledge everyone knows.
the FOI is asking for documentation on member payments, a very good question, it will be a clever bookkeeper to get around that one.
the constitution says payment with application, so there will need to be 955 payment references, if there isn't then that to me becomes a voting agreement, it doesn't get any harder then that really.
its not hard to achieve: https://www.auda.org.au/about-auda/membership/auda-online-membership-application/ you pay on the 2nd page.
or did 955 people write a cheque and post it in?
or did 955 do a direct deposit?
were there 955 faxes/emails?
surely someone in the industry is familiar with online banking? paypal?
i saw there is a rumour many members haven't paid yet? if thats the case the constitution doesn't provide a "payment plan" on membership so those 955 ( or part there of) will need to be cancelled and put to the board again once payment is received, looks like we are heading for a very late AGM this year or richard bullock do you just ignore this one as well and let auda continue to break the rules?
-----------------------
Note: Please include your Member Name in the reference/note so we can correctly identify your payment
Please Note: Cut-off for receipt of application and payment for submission to next scheduled Board meeting is 7 calendar days prior. Applications and payments received after the cut-off date will be submitted to the following scheduled Board meeting.
If for any reason your membership application is rejected, the entrance fee will be refunded in full.
------------------------------
it seems VERY clear that payment has to be made prior to your application being presented to the board.
are the rumours true?
i said when i resigned that there will be decisions i didn't want my name on but i really didn't think there would be this many ! and there are more to come before we hit the GM.
Its another question for the CMWG to ask, all your hard work will be undone if invalid members are allowed to vote. if the cmwg have the membership model right then the 955 will vote themselves out after they create a mess:
1) they vote all the other resolutions in
2) they vote themselves out
3) supply lose their leverage on auda
4) supply lose their marketing promise ( watch this space )
5) the board votes for its own board nominations committee to vote for itself ! but if i was on the board right now i'd be looking for a new position when they reduce the numbers and increase the independents.
tim
