HAHA I love the controversy some of my domains cause...
Low. However nothing to say endusers can't be sought out?
I think this is always the key point.
Lets say a domain is worth $50 - $100 wholesale (ie price it would get on Snapper/AMA), but it's reasonable to expect that a retail enduser would be willing to buy it for $500 - $1000.
If as a domainer you believe you could spend $200 in time/marketing/outsourcing to find a buyer, you've just made yourself $200 - $750 net profit.
Isn't that the point of domaining?
Of course the trick is if you are going to market your domain for sale you need to find an end user for <$200.
Obviously most domainers opt to just sit on their domains and wait for buyers to come to them rather than actively market the domain and as a result they pay $10/year holding costs, which isn't the end of the world, as long as demand for domains increase and they do eventually get to sell their domain.
This name accounts for 91 of those 5000 searches so surely there is dozens of other alternatives. If a company was looking at stats why would they use a domain with such low stats? I think the type of company that might be interested is one who isn't looking at the stats.
Well if a company is trying to rank for related terms "vinyl cutters" then the only search term that has higher search volume is [vinyl cutter] at 390... but it's arguable whether the singular or plural domain is the better option from a branding perspective...
So you say it only had 91 exacts, but really it's closer to 500 when include the plural.
I know in the past I have tried to sell the singular along with the plural domain, and buyers often don't even want the singular because it sounds bad, and I try to explain to them that the singular actually has 3 times the search volume as is just as good, but they don't care.
Well what kind of probability do you think? 1/200, 1/100 etc?
I think presently it would be somewhere in 2 - 3%/year region.
That is without marketing.
You are also assuming that search volumes and rates at which people with domains are contacted will remain the same.
I can't speak for anyone else, but the rate at which I have been contacted about domains in 2012 has been about twice as high as it was in 2011. So if I received offers on 1.5% of my portfolio last year, and let's say I'm on target to receive 3% this year, maybe I'll receive 5% in 2013 and maybe 7% in 2014...
It stands to reason as education about domains increase, along with the scarcity, that contacting rates will also increase...
Plus, I'm hoping (and I do realise that when it comes to investing "hoping" is a terrible strategy) that the NF AMA system will become more popular over time and will provide a quick and easy place to liquidate domains. So that even if a decent domain is hand registered and doesn't generate any inquiries after 2 years it could be hopefully liquidated on the AMA to recoup costs if not make a small profit therefore greatly reducing the "risk" of holding these "lower margin" domains.
As far a seeking out buyers goes how many hours do you think that will take and what is the chance of it working.
I've had "some" success with trying to drum up business, but it does come down to costs at the end of the day.
I think the secret is streamlining the selling process - that's actually why I was advocating in another thread that we as a community should compile a video that gives the complete run down on the value of domains.
So rather than all of us writing long emails, or making phone calls, we can direct leads to the right informational sources and then just answer the additional questions.
Then how long do you think the transfer/payment handling would take?
With NetFleet's system... not long at all.
To be honest NetFleet has been one of the best things that has happened to the industry. They do a cracking job.
I'd say this is one of the better names I've appraised at $0, but the numbers don't really stack up in my view, the term isn't popular enough.
Awww... I'm flattered.